Skip to content
Americas Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

CrowdForce vs DGH: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CrowdForce (CrowdForce Inc.) and DGH (Draper Goren Holm) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the United States and Canada

CrowdForce 6D Score
1.0
DGH 6D Score
2.0
Regulated Licences
0 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: crowdforce-vs-dgh

DGH outranks CrowdForce by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 1.0)

On supervisory breadth, CrowdForce holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas DGH holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightCrowdForceDGHScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite1.02.0+1.0DGH
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight1.02.0+1.0DGH
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.01.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight1.02.0+1.0DGH
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight1.02.0+1.0DGH

Visual Architecture Benchmark: CrowdForce vs DGH

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: CrowdForce vs DGH
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between CrowdForce and DGH.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeCrowdForceDGH
Primary Legal NameCrowdForce Inc.Draper Goren Holm
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI): Not suppliedU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): Not supplied
Registered Domicile / Address814 Mission Street, 6th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA1112 Montana Ave, #384, Santa Monica, California 90402, United States.
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesMulti-asset financial servicesblockchain technology services
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare CrowdForce and DGH against other regulated peers in our financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the united states and canada slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: CrowdForce vs DGH

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CrowdForce or DGH?

Both CrowdForce and DGH hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, CrowdForce maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas DGH maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI), U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CrowdForce and DGH?

In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CrowdForce records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with DGH at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do CrowdForce and DGH differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

CrowdForce lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while DGH lists blockchain technology services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CrowdForce or DGH?

CrowdForce carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while DGH carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

CrowdForce vs DGH (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Americas Firm Ledger