Skip to content
Americas Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

DGH vs GENETRADE: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of DGH (Draper Goren Holm) and GENETRADE (Genius Trading LTD) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the United States and Canada

DGH 6D Score
2.0
GENETRADE 6D Score
6.7
Regulated Licences
0 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: dgh-vs-genetrade

GENETRADE outranks DGH by +4.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.7 vs 2.0)

On supervisory breadth, DGH holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas GENETRADE holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightDGHGENETRADEScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite2.06.7+4.7GENETRADE
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight2.06.0+4.0GENETRADE
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.04.0+3.0GENETRADE
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight2.07.0+5.0GENETRADE
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight2.05.0+3.0GENETRADE

Visual Architecture Benchmark: DGH vs GENETRADE

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: DGH vs GENETRADE
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between DGH and GENETRADE.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeDGHGENETRADE
Primary Legal NameDraper Goren HolmGenius Trading LTD
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI): Not suppliedU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): Not supplied
Registered Domicile / Address1112 Montana Ave, #384, Santa Monica, California 90402, United States.Suite 201, No. 8 Eve Street, Belize City, Belize.
Offered Asset Classes & Servicesblockchain technology servicesPrecious metals, Currency pairs, Stock indices
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT4
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishVietnamese, English, Japanese, Other languages
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare DGH and GENETRADE against other regulated peers in our financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the united states and canada slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: DGH vs GENETRADE

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: DGH or GENETRADE?

Both DGH and GENETRADE hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, DGH maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI), U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas GENETRADE maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between DGH and GENETRADE?

In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), DGH records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with GENETRADE at 6.7 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do DGH and GENETRADE differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

DGH lists blockchain technology services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while GENETRADE lists Precious metals, Currency pairs, Stock indices with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: DGH or GENETRADE?

DGH carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while GENETRADE carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

DGH vs GENETRADE (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Americas Firm Ledger