Institution record
deribit
- Source score
- 4.0
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the united states and canada) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
No licence records on file for this institution.
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing deribit against peer institutions in our financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the united states and canada dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deribit (this record) | None on file | 0 / 0 | Risk level not supplied | 4.0 | 0 |
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)FINRAFinancial Conduct Authority+1 | 4 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 6.0 | 0 | |
SECFinancial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
SECFinancial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI)U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) | 0 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 2.0 | 0 | |
Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC)Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)ASIC+8 | 3 / 11 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
deribit: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is deribit's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
Our imported dataset currently holds 0 verified regulatory licence records for deribit (deribit), tracked under our financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the united states and canada coverage scope. Prospective counterparties should request primary registration certificates and cross-check the contracting entity directly on the relevant national financial supervisor's public register before onboarding.
Which of deribit's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
deribit is tracked under our financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the united states and canada coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Trading) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 0 recorded licences (none on file) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is deribit's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
deribit carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 4.0, risk & licensing: 4.0, brand: 4.0, market influence: 4.0, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to deribit's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with deribit, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to the supervising authority.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from Americas Firm Ledger relevant to deribit's supervisory scope.
regulatory-compliance
Why a Hyperliquid Treasury Firm Wants to Become a US Futures Broker
Why a Hyperliquid Treasury Firm Wants to Become a US Futures Broker: Hyperliquid Strategies has applied to become a U.S. futures commission merchant, a move that could let Americans trade perpetual futures on permission
regulation-and-institutional-markets
SEC Issues “Innovation Exemption” to Facilitate the Trading of Tokenized NMS Stock and Request for Comment
SEC Issues “Innovation Exemption” to Facilitate the Trading of Tokenized NMS Stock and Request for Comment: Summary of the supplied material covering SEC, FCA, SFC. Cross-reference the primary source release for complete details.
Federal Securities Filings
CFTC & NFA Commodity Pool Operator (CPO) Oversight: De Minimis Exemption 4.13(a)(3) vs. Full Registration
How quantitative hedge funds and crypto-derivative asset managers maintain compliance with CFTC margin thresholds without triggering full CPO overhead.
Broker-Dealer Prudential Rules
SEC Rule 15c3-3 Customer Protection Reserve: Weekly Lock-Up Computations and Segregated Control
How carrying broker-dealers isolate customer funds from proprietary trading operations through mandatory weekly reserve computations and segregated accounts.