Skip to content
Americas Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Activotrade vs DGH: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Activotrade (Activotrade) and DGH (Draper Goren Holm) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the United States and Canada

Activotrade 6D Score
5.0
DGH 6D Score
2.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: activotrade-vs-dgh

Activotrade outranks DGH by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 2.0)

On supervisory breadth, Activotrade holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas DGH holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightActivotradeDGHScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.02.0+3.0Activotrade
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.02.0+3.0Activotrade
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.01.0+2.0Activotrade
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.02.0+3.0Activotrade
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.02.0+3.0Activotrade

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Activotrade vs DGH

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Activotrade vs DGH
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Activotrade and DGH.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeActivotradeDGH
Primary Legal NameActivotradeDraper Goren Holm
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI): Not suppliedU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): Not supplied
Registered Domicile / AddressC/ Av. Diagonal 309, 6a planta, Barcelona 08013, Spain1112 Montana Ave, #384, Santa Monica, California 90402, United States.
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesStocks, ETFs, CFDs, Forex, Options, Futures and Bondsblockchain technology services
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Activotrade and DGH against other regulated peers in our financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the united states and canada slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Activotrade vs DGH

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Activotrade or DGH?

Activotrade holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Activotrade maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CNMV) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas DGH maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI), U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Activotrade and DGH?

In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Activotrade records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with DGH at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do Activotrade and DGH differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Activotrade lists Stocks, ETFs, CFDs, Forex, Options, Futures and Bonds with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while DGH lists blockchain technology services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Activotrade or DGH?

Activotrade carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while DGH carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Activotrade vs DGH (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Americas Firm Ledger