1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
CDFX vs Celpago: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CDFX (CDFX) and Celpago (Celpago USA Inc.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the United States and Canada
- CDFX 6D Score
- 1.0
- Celpago 6D Score
- 1.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
CDFX and Celpago are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (1.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, CDFX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Celpago holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | CDFX | Celpago | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: CDFX vs Celpago
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | CDFX | Celpago |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | CDFX | Celpago USA Inc. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | US | US |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare CDFX and Celpago against other regulated peers in our financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: CDFX vs Celpago
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CDFX or Celpago?
Both CDFX and Celpago hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, CDFX maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Celpago maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CDFX and Celpago?
In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CDFX records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Celpago at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do CDFX and Celpago differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
CDFX lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Celpago lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CDFX or Celpago?
CDFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Celpago carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.