1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Evest vs Fortrade: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Evest (Evest) and Fortrade (Fortrade) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the United States and Canada
- Evest 6D Score
- 5.0
- Fortrade 6D Score
- 6.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 5
- Warning Flags
- 2 vs 0
Fortrade outranks Evest by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Evest holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 2 warning count(s), whereas Fortrade holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Evest | Fortrade | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Fortrade |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Fortrade |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Fortrade |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 6.0 | +2.0 | Fortrade |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Evest vs Fortrade
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Evest | Fortrade |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Evest | Fortrade |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 11 Blackheath Village London, United Kingdom SE3 9LA | 144 Mayakovsky St., 8th floor, room 11, 220028, Minsk, Republic of Belarus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Securities, oil, precious metal CFD products, foreign currencies, stock indices |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Trade, Invest, Online, evest, MT5 | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English, German |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 2 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Evest and Fortrade against other regulated peers in our financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Evest vs Fortrade
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Evest or Fortrade?
Fortrade holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 1). Specifically, Evest maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (FSCA, VFSC) with 2 warning flag(s), whereas Fortrade maintains 5 recorded filing(s) (IIROC, Financial Conduct Authority, NBRB, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Evest and Fortrade?
In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Evest records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Fortrade at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Evest and Fortrade differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Evest lists general financial services with execution software [Trade, Invest, Online, evest, MT5], while Fortrade lists Securities, oil, precious metal CFD products, foreign currencies, stock indices with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Evest or Fortrade?
Evest carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 2 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Fortrade carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.