Skip to content
Americas Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Fortrade vs Interstellar Group: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Fortrade (Fortrade) and Interstellar Group (Interstellar Group) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the United States and Canada

Fortrade 6D Score
6.0
Interstellar Group 6D Score
7.3
Regulated Licences
5 vs 2
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fortrade-vs-interstellar-group

Interstellar Group outranks Fortrade by +1.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.3 vs 6.0)

On supervisory breadth, Fortrade holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Interstellar Group holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFortradeInterstellar GroupScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.07.3+1.3Interstellar Group
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.03.0+3.0Fortrade
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.08.6+2.6Interstellar Group
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.05.0+1.0Fortrade

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Fortrade vs Interstellar Group

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Fortrade vs Interstellar Group
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Fortrade and Interstellar Group.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFortradeInterstellar Group
Primary Legal NameFortradeInterstellar Group
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1)2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / Address144 Mayakovsky St., 8th floor, room 11, 220028, Minsk, Republic of BelarusEuro House, Richmond Hill Road, Kingstown, St. Vincent and the Grenadines.
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesSecurities, oil, precious metal CFD products, foreign currencies, stock indicesForex, precious metals, crude oil, indices
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4MT4
Supported Client LanguagesEnglish, GermanChinese, English, Japanese, Korean, Indonesian, and other languages
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Fortrade and Interstellar Group against other regulated peers in our financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the united states and canada slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Fortrade vs Interstellar Group

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Fortrade or Interstellar Group?

Fortrade holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 2). Specifically, Fortrade maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (IIROC, Financial Conduct Authority, NBRB, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Interstellar Group maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Authority Seychelles, CYSEC, SVG FSA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Fortrade and Interstellar Group?

In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Fortrade records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Interstellar Group at 7.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 8.6, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do Fortrade and Interstellar Group differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Fortrade lists Securities, oil, precious metal CFD products, foreign currencies, stock indices with execution software [MT4], while Interstellar Group lists Forex, precious metals, crude oil, indices with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Fortrade or Interstellar Group?

Fortrade carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Interstellar Group carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Fortrade vs Interstellar Group (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Americas Firm Ledger