1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
365 Capital FX vs Acquicent: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of 365 Capital FX (365 Capital FX) and Acquicent (Acquicent) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada
- 365 Capital FX 6D Score
- 1.0
- Acquicent 6D Score
- 1.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
365 Capital FX and Acquicent are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (1.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, 365 Capital FX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Acquicent holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | 365 Capital FX | Acquicent | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: 365 Capital FX vs Acquicent
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | 365 Capital FX | Acquicent |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | 365 Capital FX | Acquicent |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | US | US |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare 365 Capital FX and Acquicent against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: 365 Capital FX vs Acquicent
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: 365 Capital FX or Acquicent?
Both 365 Capital FX and Acquicent hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, 365 Capital FX maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Acquicent maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between 365 Capital FX and Acquicent?
In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), 365 Capital FX records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Acquicent at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do 365 Capital FX and Acquicent differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
365 Capital FX lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Acquicent lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: 365 Capital FX or Acquicent?
365 Capital FX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Acquicent carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.