1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Aevo Limited vs DGH: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Aevo Limited (Aevo Limited) and DGH (Draper Goren Holm) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the United States and Canada
- Aevo Limited 6D Score
- 1.1
- DGH 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
DGH outranks Aevo Limited by +0.9 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 1.1)
On supervisory breadth, Aevo Limited holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas DGH holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Aevo Limited | DGH | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.1 | 2.0 | +0.9 | DGH |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.7 | 2.0 | +0.3 | DGH |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.4 | 2.0 | +0.6 | DGH |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.3 | 2.0 | +0.7 | DGH |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Aevo Limited vs DGH
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Aevo Limited | DGH |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Aevo Limited | Draper Goren Holm |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI): Not suppliedU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): Not supplied |
| Registered Domicile / Address | - | 1112 Montana Ave, #384, Santa Monica, California 90402, United States. |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex | blockchain technology services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Aevo Limited and DGH against other regulated peers in our financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Aevo Limited vs DGH
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Aevo Limited or DGH?
Both Aevo Limited and DGH hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Aevo Limited maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas DGH maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI), U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Aevo Limited and DGH?
In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Aevo Limited records an Overall Score of 1.1 (Risk & Licensing: 1.7, Brand: 1.4, Market Influence: 1.3, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with DGH at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Aevo Limited and DGH differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Aevo Limited lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while DGH lists blockchain technology services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Aevo Limited or DGH?
Aevo Limited carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while DGH carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.