1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
AmazingTick vs FacilitaPay: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of AmazingTick (AmazingTick) and FacilitaPay (FacilitaPay) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada
- AmazingTick 6D Score
- 5.0
- FacilitaPay 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
AmazingTick and FacilitaPay are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, AmazingTick holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas FacilitaPay holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | AmazingTick | FacilitaPay | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | AmazingTick |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: AmazingTick vs FacilitaPay
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | AmazingTick | FacilitaPay |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | AmazingTick | FacilitaPay |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | CA | US |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Currency pairs, stocks, indices, metals and commodities | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare AmazingTick and FacilitaPay against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: AmazingTick vs FacilitaPay
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: AmazingTick or FacilitaPay?
FacilitaPay holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, AmazingTick maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas FacilitaPay maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Central Bank of Brazil (Banco Central do Brasil / BCB)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between AmazingTick and FacilitaPay?
In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), AmazingTick records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with FacilitaPay at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do AmazingTick and FacilitaPay differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
AmazingTick lists Currency pairs, stocks, indices, metals and commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while FacilitaPay lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: AmazingTick or FacilitaPay?
AmazingTick carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while FacilitaPay carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.