1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Audita vs CoinList: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Audita (Audita) and CoinList (Amalgamated Token Services Inc.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada
- Audita 6D Score
- 5.0
- CoinList 6D Score
- 1.3
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Audita outranks CoinList by +3.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.3)
On supervisory breadth, Audita holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas CoinList holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Audita | CoinList | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 1.3 | +3.7 | Audita |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 1.9 | +3.1 | Audita |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | Audita |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.8 | +3.2 | Audita |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.6 | +3.4 | Audita |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Audita vs CoinList
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Audita | CoinList |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Audita | Amalgamated Token Services Inc. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | US | San Francisco, CA 94133, USA |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Smart contract audit, vulnerability research and threat protection, code quality optimization, GAS optimization, document review, security consulting and training | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Audita and CoinList against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Audita vs CoinList
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Audita or CoinList?
CoinList holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Audita maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas CoinList maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FINRA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Audita and CoinList?
In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Audita records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with CoinList at 1.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.9, Brand: 1.8, Market Influence: 1.6, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Audita and CoinList differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Audita lists Smart contract audit, vulnerability research and threat protection, code quality optimization, GAS optimization, document review, security consulting and training with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while CoinList lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Audita or CoinList?
Audita carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while CoinList carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.