1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Bitwise vs Decent.land: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Bitwise (Bitwise Asset Management, Inc.) and Decent.land (Decent.land) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada
- Bitwise 6D Score
- 4.0
- Decent.land 6D Score
- 1.6
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Bitwise outranks Decent.land by +2.4 pts in composite 6D scoring (4.0 vs 1.6)
On supervisory breadth, Bitwise holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Decent.land holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Bitwise | Decent.land | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 4.0 | 1.6 | +2.4 | Bitwise |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 4.0 | 1.6 | +2.4 | Bitwise |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.0 | Bitwise |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 1.6 | +2.4 | Bitwise |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 1.6 | +2.4 | Bitwise |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Bitwise vs Decent.land
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Bitwise | Decent.land |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Bitwise Asset Management, Inc. | Decent.land |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 400 Montgomery St, Suite 600, San Francisco, CA 94111, United States | US |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | crypto assets investment, index construction, education, research | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Bitwise and Decent.land against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Bitwise vs Decent.land
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Bitwise or Decent.land?
Bitwise holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, Bitwise maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Decent.land maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Bitwise and Decent.land?
In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Bitwise records an Overall Score of 4.0 (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with Decent.land at 1.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.6, Brand: 1.6, Market Influence: 1.6, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Bitwise and Decent.land differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Bitwise lists crypto assets investment, index construction, education, research with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Decent.land lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Bitwise or Decent.land?
Bitwise carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Decent.land carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.