1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
BTCM vs Cermak FX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of BTCM (BIT Mining Limited) and Cermak FX (Cermak LLC) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada
- BTCM 6D Score
- 2.0
- Cermak FX 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
BTCM and Cermak FX are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, BTCM holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Cermak FX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | BTCM | Cermak FX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: BTCM vs Cermak FX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | BTCM | Cermak FX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | BIT Mining Limited | Cermak LLC |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 428 South Seiberling Street Akron, Ohio 44306 United States of America | Bonovo Road, Fomboni, Island of Mohéli, Comoros Union Pkhovi street N6, Tbilisi, Georgia |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | CFDs, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare BTCM and Cermak FX against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: BTCM vs Cermak FX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: BTCM or Cermak FX?
Both BTCM and Cermak FX hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, BTCM maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Cermak FX maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between BTCM and Cermak FX?
In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), BTCM records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Cermak FX at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do BTCM and Cermak FX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
BTCM lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Cermak FX lists CFDs, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: BTCM or Cermak FX?
BTCM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Cermak FX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.