1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
CASTRA LICENSEE vs DGH: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CASTRA LICENSEE (CASTRA LICENSEE PTY LTD) and DGH (Draper Goren Holm) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada
- CASTRA LICENSEE 6D Score
- 5.0
- DGH 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
CASTRA LICENSEE outranks DGH by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, CASTRA LICENSEE holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas DGH holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | CASTRA LICENSEE | DGH | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | CASTRA LICENSEE |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | CASTRA LICENSEE |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | CASTRA LICENSEE |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | CASTRA LICENSEE |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | CASTRA LICENSEE |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: CASTRA LICENSEE vs DGH
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | CASTRA LICENSEE | DGH |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | CASTRA LICENSEE PTY LTD | Draper Goren Holm |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI): Not suppliedU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): Not supplied |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 16/F, One New York Plaza 1 Whitehall St, New York NY 10004, United States | 1112 Montana Ave, #384, Santa Monica, California 90402, United States. |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX major market, FX rare market, precious metals, CFDs, cryptocurrencies | blockchain technology services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Traditional), English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare CASTRA LICENSEE and DGH against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: CASTRA LICENSEE vs DGH
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CASTRA LICENSEE or DGH?
Both CASTRA LICENSEE and DGH hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, CASTRA LICENSEE maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas DGH maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI), U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CASTRA LICENSEE and DGH?
In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CASTRA LICENSEE records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with DGH at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do CASTRA LICENSEE and DGH differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
CASTRA LICENSEE lists FX major market, FX rare market, precious metals, CFDs, cryptocurrencies with execution software [MT4], while DGH lists blockchain technology services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CASTRA LICENSEE or DGH?
CASTRA LICENSEE carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while DGH carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.