1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Cermak FX vs Decred: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Cermak FX (Cermak LLC) and Decred (Decred) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada
- Cermak FX 6D Score
- 2.0
- Decred 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Cermak FX and Decred are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Cermak FX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Decred holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Cermak FX | Decred | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Cermak FX vs Decred
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Cermak FX | Decred |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Cermak LLC | Decred |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Bonovo Road, Fomboni, Island of Mohéli, Comoros Union Pkhovi street N6, Tbilisi, Georgia | -- |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | CFDs, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Cermak FX and Decred against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Cermak FX vs Decred
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Cermak FX or Decred?
Both Cermak FX and Decred hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Cermak FX maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Decred maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Cermak FX and Decred?
In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Cermak FX records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Decred at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Cermak FX and Decred differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Cermak FX lists CFDs, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Decred lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Cermak FX or Decred?
Cermak FX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Decred carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.