Skip to content
Americas Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Charterprime vs Fortrade: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Charterprime (Charterprime Limited) and Fortrade (Fortrade) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada

Charterprime 6D Score
6.0
Fortrade 6D Score
6.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 5
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: charterprime-vs-fortrade

Charterprime and Fortrade are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 6.0)

On supervisory breadth, Charterprime holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Fortrade holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightCharterprimeFortradeScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.06.00.0Statistical Tie
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.06.00.0Statistical Tie
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.06.0+1.0Fortrade
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.06.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Charterprime vs Fortrade

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Charterprime vs Fortrade
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Charterprime and Fortrade.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeCharterprimeFortrade
Primary Legal NameCharterprime LimitedFortrade
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressSuite 408, 15 Lime Street, King Street Wharf, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia.144 Mayakovsky St., 8th floor, room 11, 220028, Minsk, Republic of Belarus
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesForeign exchange, precious metals, index contracts and other metal derivatives.Securities, oil, precious metal CFD products, foreign currencies, stock indices
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT4
Supported Client LanguagesVietnamese, English, Korean, ThaiEnglish, German
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Charterprime and Fortrade against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Charterprime vs Fortrade

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Charterprime or Fortrade?

Fortrade holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 1). Specifically, Charterprime maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Fortrade maintains 5 recorded filing(s) (IIROC, Financial Conduct Authority, NBRB, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Charterprime and Fortrade?

In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Charterprime records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Fortrade at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do Charterprime and Fortrade differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Charterprime lists Foreign exchange, precious metals, index contracts and other metal derivatives. with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Fortrade lists Securities, oil, precious metal CFD products, foreign currencies, stock indices with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Charterprime or Fortrade?

Charterprime carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Fortrade carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Charterprime vs Fortrade (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Americas Firm Ledger