1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Coinme vs rubilink: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Coinme (Coinme) and rubilink (rubilink) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada
- Coinme 6D Score
- 5.0
- rubilink 6D Score
- 1.0
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Coinme outranks rubilink by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, Coinme holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas rubilink holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Coinme | rubilink | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | Coinme |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | Coinme |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | Coinme |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | Coinme |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Coinme vs rubilink
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Coinme | rubilink |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Coinme | rubilink |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | US | Jsquare Nihonbashi 2F, Nihonbashi |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Technology services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Coinme and rubilink against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Coinme vs rubilink
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Coinme or rubilink?
Coinme holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, Coinme maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (SEC, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas rubilink maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FFAJ) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Coinme and rubilink?
In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Coinme records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with rubilink at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Coinme and rubilink differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Coinme lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while rubilink lists Technology services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Coinme or rubilink?
Coinme carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while rubilink carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.