Skip to content
Americas Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Dbinvesting vs Fortrade: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Dbinvesting (DB Invest LIMITED) and Fortrade (Fortrade) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada

Dbinvesting 6D Score
5.0
Fortrade 6D Score
6.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 5
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: dbinvesting-vs-fortrade

Fortrade outranks Dbinvesting by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, Dbinvesting holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Fortrade holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightDbinvestingFortradeScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.06.0+1.0Fortrade
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.06.0+1.0Fortrade
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.06.0+1.0Fortrade
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.06.0+1.0Fortrade

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Dbinvesting vs Fortrade

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Dbinvesting vs Fortrade
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Dbinvesting and Fortrade.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeDbinvestingFortrade
Primary Legal NameDB Invest LIMITEDFortrade
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressAbis Centre, Office 15, Avenue D’Arhoa, Providence Industrial Estate. Mahe, Seychelles144 Mayakovsky St., 8th floor, room 11, 220028, Minsk, Republic of Belarus
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesPrecious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, CurrenciesSecurities, oil, precious metal CFD products, foreign currencies, stock indices
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT4
Supported Client LanguagesEnglish, French, Arabic, Portuguese, French, Hindi, Indonesian, Malay, Thai, Simplified Chinese, VietnameseEnglish, German
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Dbinvesting and Fortrade against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Dbinvesting vs Fortrade

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Dbinvesting or Fortrade?

Fortrade holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 1). Specifically, Dbinvesting maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Authority Seychelles, SCA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Fortrade maintains 5 recorded filing(s) (IIROC, Financial Conduct Authority, NBRB, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Dbinvesting and Fortrade?

In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Dbinvesting records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Fortrade at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do Dbinvesting and Fortrade differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Dbinvesting lists Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Currencies with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Fortrade lists Securities, oil, precious metal CFD products, foreign currencies, stock indices with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Dbinvesting or Fortrade?

Dbinvesting carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Fortrade carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Dbinvesting vs Fortrade (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Americas Firm Ledger