1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Decent.land vs Radpay: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Decent.land (Decent.land) and Radpay (Radpay, Inc.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada
- Decent.land 6D Score
- 1.6
- Radpay 6D Score
- 1.6
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Decent.land and Radpay are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (1.6 vs 1.6)
On supervisory breadth, Decent.land holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Radpay holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Decent.land | Radpay | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.6 | 1.0 | +0.6 | Decent.land |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.6 | 1.9 | +0.3 | Radpay |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Decent.land vs Radpay
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Decent.land | Radpay |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Decent.land | Radpay, Inc. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | US | 7301 North 16th Street, Phoenix, AZ |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Decent.land and Radpay against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Decent.land vs Radpay
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Decent.land or Radpay?
Both Decent.land and Radpay hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Decent.land maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Radpay maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Decent.land and Radpay?
In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Decent.land records an Overall Score of 1.6 (Risk & Licensing: 1.6, Brand: 1.6, Market Influence: 1.6, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Radpay at 1.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.9, Market Influence: 1.6, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Decent.land and Radpay differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Decent.land lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Radpay lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Decent.land or Radpay?
Decent.land carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Radpay carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.