1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
DGH vs Phillip Futures: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of DGH (Draper Goren Holm) and Phillip Futures (PT Phillip Futures) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada
- DGH 6D Score
- 2.0
- Phillip Futures 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 2
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Phillip Futures outranks DGH by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, DGH holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Phillip Futures holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | DGH | Phillip Futures | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | Phillip Futures |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | Phillip Futures |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | Phillip Futures |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | Phillip Futures |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | Phillip Futures |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: DGH vs Phillip Futures
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | DGH | Phillip Futures |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Draper Goren Holm | PT Phillip Futures |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI): Not suppliedU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 1112 Montana Ave, #384, Santa Monica, California 90402, United States. | ATRIA @SUDIRMAN Lt 23B, Jl Jend Sudirman Kav 33A Jakarta 10220, Indonesia |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | blockchain technology services | CFDs, Commodities, Precious metals, Forex, Currencies |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Indonesian, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare DGH and Phillip Futures against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: DGH vs Phillip Futures
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: DGH or Phillip Futures?
Phillip Futures holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, DGH maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI), U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Phillip Futures maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (ICDX, Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPPEBTI)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between DGH and Phillip Futures?
In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), DGH records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Phillip Futures at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do DGH and Phillip Futures differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
DGH lists blockchain technology services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Phillip Futures lists CFDs, Commodities, Precious metals, Forex, Currencies with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: DGH or Phillip Futures?
DGH carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Phillip Futures carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.