1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
DGH vs Swissquote: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of DGH (Draper Goren Holm) and Swissquote (Swissquote Asia Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada
- DGH 6D Score
- 2.0
- Swissquote 6D Score
- 6.5
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 5
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Swissquote outranks DGH by +4.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.5 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, DGH holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Swissquote holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 6 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | DGH | Swissquote | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 6.5 | +4.5 | Swissquote |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 6.5 | +4.5 | Swissquote |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | Swissquote |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 6.5 | +4.5 | Swissquote |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 6.5 | +4.5 | Swissquote |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: DGH vs Swissquote
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | DGH | Swissquote |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Draper Goren Holm | Swissquote Asia Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 5 regulated / 6 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI): Not suppliedU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 1112 Montana Ave, #384, Santa Monica, California 90402, United States. | Suites 3202-4, Level 32/F ICBC Tower 3 Garden Road Central, Hong Kong |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | blockchain technology services | Currencies, stocks, indices, securities, precious metals, cryptocurrencies, news and information, robo-advisory, custody services, education |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Other regional languages, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Italian, English, French, German |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare DGH and Swissquote against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: DGH vs Swissquote
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: DGH or Swissquote?
Swissquote holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 0). Specifically, DGH maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI), U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Swissquote maintains 6 recorded filing(s) (FINMA, SFC, Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA), CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between DGH and Swissquote?
In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), DGH records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Swissquote at 6.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.5, Brand: 6.5, Market Influence: 6.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do DGH and Swissquote differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
DGH lists blockchain technology services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Swissquote lists Currencies, stocks, indices, securities, precious metals, cryptocurrencies, news and information, robo-advisory, custody services, education with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: DGH or Swissquote?
DGH carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Swissquote carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.