1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
DGH vs ZERO MARKETS: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of DGH (Draper Goren Holm) and ZERO MARKETS (ZERO MARKETS) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the United States and Canada
- DGH 6D Score
- 2.0
- ZERO MARKETS 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 2
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
ZERO MARKETS outranks DGH by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, DGH holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas ZERO MARKETS holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | DGH | ZERO MARKETS | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | ZERO MARKETS |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | ZERO MARKETS |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | ZERO MARKETS |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | ZERO MARKETS |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | ZERO MARKETS |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: DGH vs ZERO MARKETS
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | DGH | ZERO MARKETS |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Draper Goren Holm | ZERO MARKETS |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI): Not suppliedU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): Not supplied | Financial Services Commission, Mauritius: Not suppliedFMA: #569807 |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 1112 Montana Ave, #384, Santa Monica, California 90402, United States. | First St Vincent Bank Ltd Building, James Street,Kingstown, Saint Vincent’s and the Grenadines |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | blockchain technology services | indices, stocks, commodity futures, crude oil, precious metals, cryptocurrencies |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare DGH and ZERO MARKETS against other regulated peers in our financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: DGH vs ZERO MARKETS
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: DGH or ZERO MARKETS?
ZERO MARKETS holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, DGH maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI), U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas ZERO MARKETS maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission, Mauritius, FMA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between DGH and ZERO MARKETS?
In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), DGH records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with ZERO MARKETS at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do DGH and ZERO MARKETS differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
DGH lists blockchain technology services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while ZERO MARKETS lists indices, stocks, commodity futures, crude oil, precious metals, cryptocurrencies with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: DGH or ZERO MARKETS?
DGH carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while ZERO MARKETS carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.