Skip to content
Americas Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

easyMarkets vs Fortrade: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of easyMarkets (EASYMARKETS PTY LTD) and Fortrade (Fortrade) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada

easyMarkets 6D Score
5.0
Fortrade 6D Score
6.0
Regulated Licences
3 vs 5
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: easymarkets-vs-fortrade

Fortrade outranks easyMarkets by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, easyMarkets holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Fortrade holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeighteasyMarketsFortradeScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.06.0+1.0Fortrade
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.06.00.0Statistical Tie
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.03.0+1.0easyMarkets
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.06.0+1.0easyMarkets
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight7.06.0+1.0easyMarkets

Visual Architecture Benchmark: easyMarkets vs Fortrade

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: easyMarkets vs Fortrade
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between easyMarkets and Fortrade.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeeasyMarketsFortrade
Primary Legal NameEASYMARKETS PTY LTDFortrade
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings3 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1)5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressCT House,Office No.8F,Providence, Mahe, Seychelles。144 Mayakovsky St., 8th floor, room 11, 220028, Minsk, Republic of Belarus
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, CommoditiesSecurities, oil, precious metal CFD products, foreign currencies, stock indices
Execution Software & TerminalseasyMarkets Online Trading, MT4, MT5MT4
Supported Client LanguagesOther regional languages, Chinese (Simplified), Spanish, Italian, Polish, EnglishEnglish, German
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare easyMarkets and Fortrade against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: easyMarkets vs Fortrade

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: easyMarkets or Fortrade?

Fortrade holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 3). Specifically, easyMarkets maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, Financial Services Authority Seychelles, BVIFSC, FSCA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Fortrade maintains 5 recorded filing(s) (IIROC, Financial Conduct Authority, NBRB, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between easyMarkets and Fortrade?

In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), easyMarkets records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Fortrade at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do easyMarkets and Fortrade differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

easyMarkets lists Cryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [easyMarkets Online Trading, MT4, MT5], while Fortrade lists Securities, oil, precious metal CFD products, foreign currencies, stock indices with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: easyMarkets or Fortrade?

easyMarkets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Fortrade carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

easyMarkets vs Fortrade (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Americas Firm Ledger