1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FacilitaPay vs Prometheum: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FacilitaPay (FacilitaPay) and Prometheum (Prometheum Inc.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada
- FacilitaPay 6D Score
- 5.0
- Prometheum 6D Score
- 1.4
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
FacilitaPay outranks Prometheum by +3.6 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.4)
On supervisory breadth, FacilitaPay holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Prometheum holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FacilitaPay | Prometheum | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 1.4 | +3.6 | FacilitaPay |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 1.4 | +3.6 | FacilitaPay |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.7 | +3.3 | FacilitaPay |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.6 | +3.4 | FacilitaPay |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FacilitaPay vs Prometheum
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FacilitaPay | Prometheum |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | FacilitaPay | Prometheum Inc. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | US | 132 W 31st St, New York, NY 10001 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FacilitaPay and Prometheum against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FacilitaPay vs Prometheum
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FacilitaPay or Prometheum?
Both FacilitaPay and Prometheum hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FacilitaPay maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Central Bank of Brazil (Banco Central do Brasil / BCB)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Prometheum maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FINRA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FacilitaPay and Prometheum?
In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FacilitaPay records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Prometheum at 1.4 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.4, Brand: 1.7, Market Influence: 1.6, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do FacilitaPay and Prometheum differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FacilitaPay lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Prometheum lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FacilitaPay or Prometheum?
FacilitaPay carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Prometheum carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.