Skip to content
Americas Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Fortrade vs INFINOX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Fortrade (Fortrade) and INFINOX (INFINOX) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada

Fortrade 6D Score
6.0
INFINOX 6D Score
4.0
Regulated Licences
5 vs 2
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fortrade-vs-infinox

Fortrade outranks INFINOX by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 4.0)

On supervisory breadth, Fortrade holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas INFINOX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFortradeINFINOXScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.04.0+2.0Fortrade
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.04.0+2.0Fortrade
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.02.0+1.0Fortrade
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.04.0+2.0Fortrade
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.04.0+2.0Fortrade

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Fortrade vs INFINOX

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Fortrade vs INFINOX
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Fortrade and INFINOX.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFortradeINFINOX
Primary Legal NameFortradeINFINOX
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1)2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / Address144 Mayakovsky St., 8th floor, room 11, 220028, Minsk, Republic of BelarusCredentia International Management, Cyberati Lounge, Ground Floor, The Catalyst Building, 40 Cybercity, Ebene, Republic of
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesSecurities, oil, precious metal CFD products, foreign currencies, stock indicesForeign exchange, stock CFD, index, commodities, bonds, futures CFD, cryptocurrency CFD, etc.
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4IX SOCIAL, MT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglish, GermanOther languages, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English, Korean
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Fortrade and INFINOX against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Fortrade vs INFINOX

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Fortrade or INFINOX?

Fortrade holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 2). Specifically, Fortrade maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (IIROC, Financial Conduct Authority, NBRB, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas INFINOX maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (SCB, Financial Conduct Authority, Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Fortrade and INFINOX?

In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Fortrade records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with INFINOX at 4.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).

How do Fortrade and INFINOX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Fortrade lists Securities, oil, precious metal CFD products, foreign currencies, stock indices with execution software [MT4], while INFINOX lists Foreign exchange, stock CFD, index, commodities, bonds, futures CFD, cryptocurrency CFD, etc. with execution software [IX SOCIAL, MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Fortrade or INFINOX?

Fortrade carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while INFINOX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Fortrade vs INFINOX (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Americas Firm Ledger