Skip to content
Americas Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Fortrade vs MIBD: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Fortrade (Fortrade) and MIBD (Marigold International Bullion limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the United States and Canada

Fortrade 6D Score
6.0
MIBD 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
5 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fortrade-vs-mibd

Fortrade outranks MIBD by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, Fortrade holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas MIBD holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFortradeMIBDScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.05.0+1.0Fortrade
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.05.0+1.0Fortrade
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.05.0+1.0Fortrade
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.05.0+1.0Fortrade

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Fortrade vs MIBD

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Fortrade vs MIBD
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Fortrade and MIBD.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFortradeMIBD
Primary Legal NameFortradeMarigold International Bullion limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / Address144 Mayakovsky St., 8th floor, room 11, 220028, Minsk, Republic of Belarus18F, MG Tower, No.133 Hoi Bun Road, Kwun Tong, Hong Kong(MTR Kwun Tong line: Ngau Tau Kok Station exit B6)
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesSecurities, oil, precious metal CFD products, foreign currencies, stock indicesForex, Stocks, Futures, Gold, Silver
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglish, GermanChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Fortrade and MIBD against other regulated peers in our financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the united states and canada slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Fortrade vs MIBD

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Fortrade or MIBD?

Fortrade holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 1). Specifically, Fortrade maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (IIROC, Financial Conduct Authority, NBRB, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas MIBD maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CGSE) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Fortrade and MIBD?

In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Fortrade records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with MIBD at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do Fortrade and MIBD differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Fortrade lists Securities, oil, precious metal CFD products, foreign currencies, stock indices with execution software [MT4], while MIBD lists Forex, Stocks, Futures, Gold, Silver with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Fortrade or MIBD?

Fortrade carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while MIBD carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Fortrade vs MIBD (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Americas Firm Ledger