Skip to content
Americas Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Fortrade vs PT.Java Global Futures: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Fortrade (Fortrade) and PT.Java Global Futures (PT.Java Global Futures) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada

Fortrade 6D Score
6.0
PT.Java Global Futures 6D Score
4.0
Regulated Licences
5 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fortrade-vs-pt-java-global-futures-7948

Fortrade outranks PT.Java Global Futures by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 4.0)

On supervisory breadth, Fortrade holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas PT.Java Global Futures holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFortradePT.Java Global FuturesScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.04.0+2.0Fortrade
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.04.0+2.0Fortrade
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.02.0+1.0Fortrade
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.04.0+2.0Fortrade
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.04.0+2.0Fortrade

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Fortrade vs PT.Java Global Futures

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Fortrade vs PT.Java Global Futures
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Fortrade and PT.Java Global Futures.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFortradePT.Java Global Futures
Primary Legal NameFortradePT.Java Global Futures
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / Address144 Mayakovsky St., 8th floor, room 11, 220028, Minsk, Republic of BelarusForesta Business Loft 5 Unit 15 Jl. BSD Boulevard, Lengkong Kulon Pagedangan Tangerang Banten 15331
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesSecurities, oil, precious metal CFD products, foreign currencies, stock indicesCurrency pairs, metals, energies, Asian stocks and more
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4MT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglish, GermanIndonesian, English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Fortrade and PT.Java Global Futures against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Fortrade vs PT.Java Global Futures

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Fortrade or PT.Java Global Futures?

Fortrade holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 1). Specifically, Fortrade maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (IIROC, Financial Conduct Authority, NBRB, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas PT.Java Global Futures maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ICDX) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Fortrade and PT.Java Global Futures?

In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Fortrade records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with PT.Java Global Futures at 4.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).

How do Fortrade and PT.Java Global Futures differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Fortrade lists Securities, oil, precious metal CFD products, foreign currencies, stock indices with execution software [MT4], while PT.Java Global Futures lists Currency pairs, metals, energies, Asian stocks and more with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Fortrade or PT.Java Global Futures?

Fortrade carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while PT.Java Global Futures carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Fortrade vs PT.Java Global Futures (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Americas Firm Ledger