Skip to content
Americas Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Fortrade vs SCDEX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Fortrade (Fortrade) and SCDEX (SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the United States and Canada

Fortrade 6D Score
6.0
SCDEX 6D Score
9.3
Regulated Licences
5 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fortrade-vs-scdex

SCDEX outranks Fortrade by +3.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (9.3 vs 6.0)

On supervisory breadth, Fortrade holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SCDEX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFortradeSCDEXScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.09.3+3.3SCDEX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.09.5+3.5SCDEX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.09.3+6.3SCDEX
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.09.2+9.2SCDEX
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.09.4+3.4SCDEX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.09.1+3.1SCDEX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Fortrade vs SCDEX

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Fortrade vs SCDEX
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Fortrade and SCDEX.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFortradeSCDEX
Primary Legal NameFortradeSCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedLow risk
Active Regulated / Total Filings5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / Address144 Mayakovsky St., 8th floor, room 11, 220028, Minsk, Republic of Belarus1312 17th Street Suite 692, Denver, COLORADO 80202
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesSecurities, oil, precious metal CFD products, foreign currencies, stock indicesCrypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine
Supported Client LanguagesEnglish, GermanEnglish, Traditional Chinese, Japanese, Korean, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Vietnamese, Thai
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Fortrade and SCDEX against other regulated peers in our financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the united states and canada slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Fortrade vs SCDEX

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Fortrade or SCDEX?

Fortrade holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 0). Specifically, Fortrade maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (IIROC, Financial Conduct Authority, NBRB, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SCDEX maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (NFA, FinCEN) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Fortrade and SCDEX?

In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Fortrade records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with SCDEX at 9.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 9.5, Brand: 9.4, Market Influence: 9.1, User Reputation: 9.2, Execution & Software: 9.3).

How do Fortrade and SCDEX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Fortrade lists Securities, oil, precious metal CFD products, foreign currencies, stock indices with execution software [MT4], while SCDEX lists Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances with execution software [SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Fortrade or SCDEX?

Fortrade carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SCDEX carries a "Low risk" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Fortrade vs SCDEX (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Americas Firm Ledger