Skip to content
Americas Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

iFOREX vs Triple-A: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of iFOREX (iFOREX) and Triple-A (Triple-A) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada

iFOREX 6D Score
6.0
Triple-A 6D Score
5.6
Regulated Licences
1 vs 2
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: iforex-vs-triple-a

iFOREX outranks Triple-A by +0.4 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.6)

On supervisory breadth, iFOREX holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Triple-A holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightiFOREXTriple-AScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.05.6+0.4iFOREX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.05.6+0.4iFOREX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.03.0+1.0iFOREX
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.05.6+0.4iFOREX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.05.6+0.4iFOREX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: iFOREX vs Triple-A

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: iFOREX vs Triple-A
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between iFOREX and Triple-A.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeiFOREXTriple-A
Primary Legal NameiFOREXTriple-A
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressCorner of Agiou Andreou & Venizelou Streets, Vashiotos Agiou Andreou Building, Second Floor, P.O.B 54216, Limassol, Cyprus.SG
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesTrading sentiment, indices, economic calendar, real-time charts, trading signals, stocksMulti-asset financial services
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesOther languages, English, JapaneseEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare iFOREX and Triple-A against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: iFOREX vs Triple-A

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: iFOREX or Triple-A?

Triple-A holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, iFOREX maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (BVIFSC, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Triple-A maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), MAS) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between iFOREX and Triple-A?

In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), iFOREX records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Triple-A at 5.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.6, Brand: 5.6, Market Influence: 5.6, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do iFOREX and Triple-A differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

iFOREX lists Trading sentiment, indices, economic calendar, real-time charts, trading signals, stocks with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Triple-A lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: iFOREX or Triple-A?

iFOREX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Triple-A carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

iFOREX vs Triple-A (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Americas Firm Ledger