1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Petra Wallet vs Storj: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Petra Wallet (Petra Wallet) and Storj (Storj) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada
- Petra Wallet 6D Score
- 2.4
- Storj 6D Score
- 3.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Storj outranks Petra Wallet by +0.6 pts in composite 6D scoring (3.0 vs 2.4)
On supervisory breadth, Petra Wallet holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Storj holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Petra Wallet | Storj | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.4 | 3.0 | +0.6 | Storj |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | Storj |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.0 | Petra Wallet |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.5 | 3.0 | +0.5 | Storj |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Petra Wallet vs Storj
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Petra Wallet | Storj |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Petra Wallet | Storj |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 1209 North Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, USA | 1450 West Peachtree Street NorthWest, Suite 200, PMB 75268, Atlanta, GA 30309-2955 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Transfers, managed assets, token purchases, staking and hardware wallet support | Cloud storage |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Petra Wallet and Storj against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Petra Wallet vs Storj
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Petra Wallet or Storj?
Both Petra Wallet and Storj hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Petra Wallet maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Storj maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Petra Wallet and Storj?
In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Petra Wallet records an Overall Score of 2.4 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 2.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with Storj at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Petra Wallet and Storj differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Petra Wallet lists Transfers, managed assets, token purchases, staking and hardware wallet support with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Storj lists Cloud storage with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Petra Wallet or Storj?
Petra Wallet carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Storj carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.