Skip to content
Americas Firm Ledger
Directory

Institution record

Bitpanda Wallet

Bitpanda

Risk level not supplied5 of 6 licences marked regulated
Source score
2.5
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the united states and canada) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
Municipal District Office of Vienna (Magistratisches Bezirksamt)
FN 511923 dRegulatedBitpanda Metals GmbH2020
Austrian Financial Market Authority
FN 569240 vRegisteredBitpanda GmbH2024
Austrian Financial Market Authority
FN 551181 kRegulatedBitpanda Financial Services GmbH2024
Austrian Financial Market Authority
FN 501412 xRegulatedBitpanda Payments GmbH2019
Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht
HRB 258842 BRegulatedBitpanda Asset Management GmbH2024
Financial Conduct Authority
11625148RegulatedBitpanda Custody Ltd2023

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Bitpanda Wallet against peer institutions in our financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the united states and canada dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
Bitpanda Wallet (this record)
Municipal District Office of Vienna (Magistratisches Bezirksamt)FMAFMA+3
5 / 6Risk level not supplied2.50
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)FINRAFinancial Conduct Authority+1
4 / 4Risk level not supplied6.00
Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC)Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)ASIC+8
3 / 11Risk level not supplied—0
IIROCFinancial Conduct AuthorityNBRB+2
5 / 5Risk level not supplied6.00
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)CYSECMFSA+3
6 / 6Risk level not supplied5.00
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)Financial Conduct Authority
2 / 2Risk level not supplied4.00

Bitpanda Wallet: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is Bitpanda Wallet's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, Bitpanda Wallet (legal entity reference: Bitpanda) holds 6 recorded licence entries, of which 5 carry a "regulated" status and 6 are marked regulated or registered: Municipal District Office of Vienna (Magistratisches Bezirksamt) — licence FN 511923 d, status: regulated; FMA (Austrian Financial Market Authority) — licence FN 569240 v, status: registered; FMA (Austrian Financial Market Authority) — licence FN 551181 k, status: regulated; FMA (Austrian Financial Market Authority) — licence FN 501412 x, status: regulated; BaFin (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht) — licence HRB 258842 B, status: regulated; Financial Conduct Authority — licence 11625148, status: regulated. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official Municipal District Office of Vienna (Magistratisches Bezirksamt), FMA, BaFin public register.

Which of Bitpanda Wallet's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

Bitpanda Wallet is registered at -- and tracked under our financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the united states and canada scope based on its institutional service profile (Digital asset management, Trade execution, Transfers) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 6 recorded licences (Municipal District Office of Vienna (Magistratisches Bezirksamt), FMA, BaFin, Financial Conduct Authority) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is Bitpanda Wallet's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

Bitpanda Wallet carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 2.5, risk & licensing: 2.2, brand: 3.0, market influence: 2.6, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to Bitpanda Wallet's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with Bitpanda Wallet, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (bitpanda.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to Municipal District Office of Vienna (Magistratisches Bezirksamt).

Editorial briefings and compliance research from Americas Firm Ledger relevant to Bitpanda Wallet's supervisory scope.

All research →
Bitpanda Wallet — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | Americas Firm Ledger