1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
AUS GLOBAL vs Fortrade: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of AUS GLOBAL (AUS Global MU Limited) and Fortrade (Fortrade) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada
- AUS GLOBAL 6D Score
- 7.1
- Fortrade 6D Score
- 6.0
- Regulated Licences
- 3 vs 5
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
AUS GLOBAL outranks Fortrade by +1.1 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.1 vs 6.0)
On supervisory breadth, AUS GLOBAL holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Fortrade holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | AUS GLOBAL | Fortrade | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.1 | 6.0 | +1.1 | AUS GLOBAL |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 7.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | AUS GLOBAL |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.9 | 6.0 | +0.9 | AUS GLOBAL |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.3 | 6.0 | +1.3 | AUS GLOBAL |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: AUS GLOBAL vs Fortrade
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | AUS GLOBAL | Fortrade |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | AUS Global MU Limited | Fortrade |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 3 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1) | 5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Suite 803,8 Floor,Hennessy Tower Pope Hennessy Street Port Louis , Mauritius | 144 Mayakovsky St., 8th floor, room 11, 220028, Minsk, Republic of Belarus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | US and EU stocks, forex, precious metals, futures, stock indices, cryptocurrencies | Securities, oil, precious metal CFD products, foreign currencies, stock indices |
| Execution Software & Terminals | AUS GLOBAL cTrader, MT4, MT5 | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Arabic, French, Italian, Spanish, Hindi, Dutch, Vietnamese, Chinese (Traditional), Persian, German, Russian, Portuguese, Thai, Malay, Turkish | English, German |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare AUS GLOBAL and Fortrade against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: AUS GLOBAL vs Fortrade
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: AUS GLOBAL or Fortrade?
Fortrade holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 3). Specifically, AUS GLOBAL maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (SCA, ASIC, CyFO, FSCA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Fortrade maintains 5 recorded filing(s) (IIROC, Financial Conduct Authority, NBRB, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between AUS GLOBAL and Fortrade?
In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), AUS GLOBAL records an Overall Score of 7.1 (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 6.9, Market Influence: 7.3, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Fortrade at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do AUS GLOBAL and Fortrade differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
AUS GLOBAL lists US and EU stocks, forex, precious metals, futures, stock indices, cryptocurrencies with execution software [AUS GLOBAL cTrader, MT4, MT5], while Fortrade lists Securities, oil, precious metal CFD products, foreign currencies, stock indices with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: AUS GLOBAL or Fortrade?
AUS GLOBAL carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Fortrade carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.