Skip to content
Americas Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

DGH vs Regain Capital: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of DGH (Draper Goren Holm) and Regain Capital (Regain Capital) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada

DGH 6D Score
2.0
Regain Capital 6D Score
4.0
Regulated Licences
0 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 2
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: dgh-vs-regain-capital

Regain Capital outranks DGH by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (4.0 vs 2.0)

On supervisory breadth, DGH holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Regain Capital holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 2 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightDGHRegain CapitalScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite2.04.0+2.0Regain Capital
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight2.04.0+2.0Regain Capital
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.02.0+1.0Regain Capital
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight2.05.0+3.0Regain Capital
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight2.04.0+2.0Regain Capital

Visual Architecture Benchmark: DGH vs Regain Capital

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: DGH vs Regain Capital
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between DGH and Regain Capital.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeDGHRegain Capital
Primary Legal NameDraper Goren HolmRegain Capital
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI): Not suppliedU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): Not supplied
Registered Domicile / Address1112 Montana Ave, #384, Santa Monica, California 90402, United States.Room 7, 1st Floor, Dekk House, Zippora Street, Providence Industrial Estate, Mahe, Seychelles
Offered Asset Classes & Servicesblockchain technology servicesForex, precious metals, indices, crude oil, currencies
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT4
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishSpanish, Tagalog, Malay, English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)2 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare DGH and Regain Capital against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: DGH vs Regain Capital

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: DGH or Regain Capital?

Both DGH and Regain Capital hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, DGH maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI), U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Regain Capital maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FSPR) with 2 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between DGH and Regain Capital?

In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), DGH records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Regain Capital at 4.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).

How do DGH and Regain Capital differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

DGH lists blockchain technology services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Regain Capital lists Forex, precious metals, indices, crude oil, currencies with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: DGH or Regain Capital?

DGH carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Regain Capital carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 2 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

DGH vs Regain Capital (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Americas Firm Ledger