1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
DGH vs Scalable Capital: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of DGH (Draper Goren Holm) and Scalable Capital (Scalable Capital GmbH) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada
- DGH 6D Score
- 2.0
- Scalable Capital 6D Score
- 3.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 2
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Scalable Capital outranks DGH by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (3.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, DGH holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Scalable Capital holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | DGH | Scalable Capital | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | Scalable Capital |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | Scalable Capital |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Scalable Capital |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | Scalable Capital |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | Scalable Capital |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: DGH vs Scalable Capital
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | DGH | Scalable Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Draper Goren Holm | Scalable Capital GmbH |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI): Not suppliedU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): Not supplied | BaFin: Not suppliedFinancial Conduct Authority: Not supplied |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 1112 Montana Ave, #384, Santa Monica, California 90402, United States. | Seitzstraße 8e, 80538 München, Germany |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | blockchain technology services | Cryptocurrencies |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare DGH and Scalable Capital against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: DGH vs Scalable Capital
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: DGH or Scalable Capital?
Scalable Capital holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, DGH maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI), U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Scalable Capital maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (BaFin, Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between DGH and Scalable Capital?
In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), DGH records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Scalable Capital at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do DGH and Scalable Capital differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
DGH lists blockchain technology services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Scalable Capital lists Cryptocurrencies with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: DGH or Scalable Capital?
DGH carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Scalable Capital carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.