1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Fortrade vs Scalable Capital: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Fortrade (Fortrade) and Scalable Capital (Scalable Capital GmbH) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada
- Fortrade 6D Score
- 6.0
- Scalable Capital 6D Score
- 3.0
- Regulated Licences
- 5 vs 2
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Fortrade outranks Scalable Capital by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, Fortrade holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Scalable Capital holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Fortrade | Scalable Capital | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.0 | 3.0 | +3.0 | Fortrade |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 3.0 | +3.0 | Fortrade |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Fortrade |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 3.0 | +3.0 | Fortrade |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 3.0 | +3.0 | Fortrade |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Fortrade vs Scalable Capital
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Fortrade | Scalable Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Fortrade | Scalable Capital GmbH |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | BaFin: Not suppliedFinancial Conduct Authority: Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 144 Mayakovsky St., 8th floor, room 11, 220028, Minsk, Republic of Belarus | Seitzstraße 8e, 80538 München, Germany |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Securities, oil, precious metal CFD products, foreign currencies, stock indices | Cryptocurrencies |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English, German | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Fortrade and Scalable Capital against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Fortrade vs Scalable Capital
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Fortrade or Scalable Capital?
Fortrade holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 2). Specifically, Fortrade maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (IIROC, Financial Conduct Authority, NBRB, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Scalable Capital maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (BaFin, Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Fortrade and Scalable Capital?
In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Fortrade records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Scalable Capital at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do Fortrade and Scalable Capital differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Fortrade lists Securities, oil, precious metal CFD products, foreign currencies, stock indices with execution software [MT4], while Scalable Capital lists Cryptocurrencies with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Fortrade or Scalable Capital?
Fortrade carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Scalable Capital carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.