Skip to content
Americas Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

easyMarkets vs Triple-A: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of easyMarkets (EASYMARKETS PTY LTD) and Triple-A (Triple-A) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected financial institution and registrant records: United States and Canada

easyMarkets 6D Score
5.0
Triple-A 6D Score
5.6
Regulated Licences
3 vs 2
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: easymarkets-vs-triple-a

Triple-A outranks easyMarkets by +0.6 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.6 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, easyMarkets holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Triple-A holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeighteasyMarketsTriple-AScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.05.6+0.6Triple-A
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.05.6+0.4easyMarkets
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.03.0+1.0easyMarkets
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.05.6+1.4easyMarkets
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight7.05.6+1.4easyMarkets

Visual Architecture Benchmark: easyMarkets vs Triple-A

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: easyMarkets vs Triple-A
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between easyMarkets and Triple-A.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeeasyMarketsTriple-A
Primary Legal NameEASYMARKETS PTY LTDTriple-A
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings3 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1)2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressCT House,Office No.8F,Providence, Mahe, Seychelles。SG
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, CommoditiesMulti-asset financial services
Execution Software & TerminalseasyMarkets Online Trading, MT4, MT5Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesOther regional languages, Chinese (Simplified), Spanish, Italian, Polish, EnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare easyMarkets and Triple-A against other regulated peers in our selected financial institution and registrant records: united states and canada slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: easyMarkets vs Triple-A

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: easyMarkets or Triple-A?

easyMarkets holds more active regulated filings (3 vs 2). Specifically, easyMarkets maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, Financial Services Authority Seychelles, BVIFSC, FSCA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Triple-A maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), MAS) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between easyMarkets and Triple-A?

In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), easyMarkets records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Triple-A at 5.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.6, Brand: 5.6, Market Influence: 5.6, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do easyMarkets and Triple-A differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

easyMarkets lists Cryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [easyMarkets Online Trading, MT4, MT5], while Triple-A lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: easyMarkets or Triple-A?

easyMarkets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Triple-A carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

easyMarkets vs Triple-A (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Americas Firm Ledger