1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
SCDEX vs UPTIQ: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of SCDEX (SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE) and UPTIQ (UPTIQ Technologies Inc) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the United States and Canada
- SCDEX 6D Score
- 9.3
- UPTIQ 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
SCDEX outranks UPTIQ by +4.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (9.3 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, SCDEX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas UPTIQ holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | SCDEX | UPTIQ | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 9.3 | 5.0 | +4.3 | SCDEX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 9.5 | 5.0 | +4.5 | SCDEX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 9.3 | 1.0 | +8.3 | SCDEX |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 9.2 | 0.0 | +9.2 | SCDEX |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 9.4 | 5.0 | +4.4 | SCDEX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 9.1 | 5.0 | +4.1 | SCDEX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: SCDEX vs UPTIQ
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | SCDEX | UPTIQ |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE | UPTIQ Technologies Inc |
| Source Risk Classification | Low risk | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 1312 17th Street Suite 692, Denver, COLORADO 80202 | 7300 State Hwy 121, Suite 300, McKinney TX 75070 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English, Traditional Chinese, Japanese, Korean, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Vietnamese, Thai | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare SCDEX and UPTIQ against other regulated peers in our financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: SCDEX vs UPTIQ
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: SCDEX or UPTIQ?
UPTIQ holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, SCDEX maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (NFA, FinCEN) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas UPTIQ maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between SCDEX and UPTIQ?
In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), SCDEX records an Overall Score of 9.3 (Risk & Licensing: 9.5, Brand: 9.4, Market Influence: 9.1, User Reputation: 9.2, Execution & Software: 9.3), compared with UPTIQ at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do SCDEX and UPTIQ differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
SCDEX lists Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances with execution software [SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine], while UPTIQ lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: SCDEX or UPTIQ?
SCDEX carries a "Low risk" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while UPTIQ carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.