1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Skrill vs XM: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Skrill (Skrill) and XM (XM Global Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the United States and Canada
- Skrill 6D Score
- 5.0
- XM 6D Score
- 8.5
- Regulated Licences
- 3 vs 4
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
XM outranks Skrill by +3.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (8.5 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Skrill holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas XM holds 4 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Skrill | XM | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 8.5 | +3.5 | XM |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 8.5 | +6.5 | XM |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 6.0 | +3.0 | XM |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 8.5 | +4.5 | XM |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 8.5 | +4.5 | XM |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Skrill vs XM
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Skrill | XM |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Skrill | XM Global Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 3 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) | 4 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 1st Floor, 2 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7AD, United Kingdom | Coppergate House 10 Whites Row London E1 7NFE 1 7 N F UNITED KINGDOM No. 5 Cork Street, Belize City, Belize, CA. Suite 404, The Matalon, Coney Drive, Belize City, Belize |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Digital wallets, online payments, money transfers, cryptocurrency transactions | Forex, stocks, precious metals, CFDs |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | XM, MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and more than 30 languages worldwide |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Skrill and XM against other regulated peers in our financial institutions and registrants headquartered in the united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Skrill vs XM
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Skrill or XM?
XM holds more active regulated filings (4 vs 3). Specifically, Skrill maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), CBI, Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas XM maintains 5 recorded filing(s) (ASIC, CYSEC, FSCA, Financial Services Commission) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Skrill and XM?
In Americas Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Skrill records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with XM at 8.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 8.5, Brand: 8.5, Market Influence: 8.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 6.0).
How do Skrill and XM differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Skrill lists Digital wallets, online payments, money transfers, cryptocurrency transactions with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while XM lists Forex, stocks, precious metals, CFDs with execution software [XM, MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Skrill or XM?
Skrill carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while XM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.